Since 1997, Taiwan Lourdes Association (Hereinafter abbreviated as TLA) has entered to its 24th year. Based on the service provided this year, we have summarized our achievements into four main categories :
(1)Stability
"In recent years, we have observed a trend in the average age of our overall service recipients gradually increasing. While TLA has consistently maintained approximately a quarter of new service recipients each year (23% in 2020), the age distribution of service recipients still predominantly falls within the 41-50 age group, constituting 39% of the total service population. Furthermore, examining the situation of external referrals, we have noticed a gradual reduction in the resources offered by external entities. The economic needs of our service recipients persist, and assisting them in reintegration and healthy aging has become a major challenge.
This year, the number of multiple-needs new cases has decreased by approximately 10%, primarily. Notably, individuals struggling with non-opioid substance addiction continue to increase, constituting around 75% of the total service volume. In recent years, the issue of substance addiction among cases has grown, often accompanied by comorbid mental health challenges, leading to increased complexity in case demands. Additionally, these cases frequently involve urgent situations such as self-harm and acute psychiatric symptoms, contributing to an increased mental burden on our staff.
(2)Adjustment
In 2020, due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, TLA had to cancel or postpone numerous activities and outreach efforts. The planned international conferences and exchanges were also unable to proceed as a result. In response to the pandemic, we adjusted our previous work patterns and implemented measures in line with epidemic prevention.
Since the establishment of the Hualien and Taitung support group in 2016 to meet the needs of people living with HIV/AIDS (Hereinafter abbreviated as PLWHA) in remote areas, we expanded our services by setting up a base in Taitung in 2018. Over the past five years, we have continuously developed and deepened our services in the Taitung region. Responding to changing demands, we identified a need for increased service investment and staff adjustments in the Hualien area. Therefore, we will be relocating our base to be perpetually situated in Hualien, with Taitung receiving periodic services.
Since taking over the Youth Substance Abuse Program for Levels 3 and 4 in March 2016, we've gained four years of service experience. Initially focused on serving youths and families dealing with the levels 3 and 4 substances use , we gradually expanded our outreach to Juvenile Detention Houses to include neglected and street-involved youths who were entangled in substance use and legal issues. Simultaneously, we provided support to many parents grappling with issues related to upbringing, finances, and parent-child relationships. Over the years, we observed that the challenges faced by youths using substances not only highlight the presence of illegal substances but also repeatedly underscore the need for societal and institutional reforms and adjustments. Considering our organizational capacity and resource allocation, we concluded this program at the end of 2020. However, we remain a friendly backup for collaboration with other organizations.
(3)Enhancement
In 2019, our organization received subsidies from the Ministry of Health and Welfare, allowing us to leverage our accumulated years of experience from the Chaolu Therapeutic Community. We expanded it into a therapeutic community for addiction treatment. After months of preparation, we officially commenced operations in 2020. Guided by a harm reduction approach that respects human dignity, our intervention covers the holistic aspects of individuals, including physical, psychological, interpersonal, social, occupational, and spiritual dimensions. Our goal is to empower individuals on their journey toward recovery. Through reflective learning during the service process, we continuously make rolling adjustments, accumulating localized experience in harm reduction therapeutic community services.
(4) Advocacy
This year, in response to government policy recommendations, we observed challenges faced by clients who, due to sexual violence, needed PEP (post-exposure prophylaxis) but couldn't find support from social welfare agencies. Therefore, we proposed clarifying responsibilities in the Rights Protection Committee to ensure that Centers for Prevention of Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault are aware of their obligation to provide necessary assistance to victims. Additionally, we advocated for the modification of the definition of risky behaviors in the committee, alleviating concerns for PLWHA who are already untransmittable by potential legal consequences.
In the process of shifting the focus of addiction prevention and treatment from the legal system to rehabilitation, we actively participated in providing policy advice and practical experience on the establishment of the Addiction Integrated Medical Demonstration Center, the renovation of Addiction Prevention Centers, the deployment of resources for addiction social reintegration, and the diverse development of therapeutic communities.
On the societal front, we noticed the dental care challenges faced by PLWHA. We organized a focused forum, received coverage from SET News, and advocated for the medical rights of PLWHA, urging the implementation of universal protective guidelines. Recognizing the prolonged societal challenges faced by female PLWHA, we collaborated with several female celebrities to produce advocacy videos, emphasizing the importance of paying attention to women's sexual health.
To address the deficiencies in Article 21 of the HIV Infection Control and Patient Rights Protection Act., we created an infographic summarizing five key points:
1. Difficulty in providing evidence, violating the law of evidence
2. Punishment even when untransmittable
3. Potentially misused for revenge or intimidation,
4. Adversely affecting epidemic prevention,
5. Penalties higher than those for Category 1 communicable diseases, violating The Principle of Proportionality.